Suffice it to say it can be very frustrating and discouraging when you prepare for an event and it doesn't pan out. Time, money, and effort are put into the preparedness and it feels like all such things are wasted when there is not so much as a good thunderstorm. The feeling is contradictory in nature; on one hand we're waiting for, expecting, maybe even (disturbingly) looking forward to a severe, disruptive event, while on the other hand no one really wishes destruction of property or, more-so-still, loss of life. Based on those factors we should be happy and relieved if an anticipated disaster fails to manifest, but the emotional response is disappointment that at times can lead to some dangerous ways of thinking.
Most commonly when emergency management and weather services notify the public of impending events that do not occur, it erodes trust in those services in the whole Boy Who Cried Wolf mentality. The next time severe weather threatens, those same people won't take watches or even warnings as seriously as they should. That's a tough row to hoe, and steps typically need to be taken to mend that trust. In the case of the 13th, the local emergency management services actually put out an apology and an explanation of what happened to the predictive models. Communication like that helps to restore a bit of trust.
Steps should also be taken to level-set and add a dose of reality. Like I said, sometimes it just pays to remind people that a severe weather event always has the potential to take lives, damage property, and disrupt routines for days, weeks, even months. People should be grateful if weather tones down to be softer than expected. As the saying in finance goes, "past performance is not an indicator of future results."
No comments:
Post a Comment